What's New In DevTools (Chrome 96) - Chrome Developers.Or forking webkit could be a possibility, turning it into a web browser which works cross-platform and has similar features to firefox. All we need is a community driven chromium fork, just like what Blink did to Webkit. Graphics means everything from webgl to CSS, and honestly I don't care if google is recording my sentence in Scratch to move a sprite, google anyway has lot more critical data, and my whole browsing history even in incognito mode.As a firefox user, it's annoying to see things like backdrop-filter taking YEARS to be implemented. My primary job is web development, and Mozilla is the new IE, where the things simply don't work. Also its not me who is saying, the whole world have the same opinion:, that Mozilla is almost dead. My eye sight is not very bad, but not excellent also, and I rely on TTS very much.
![webkit vs blink webkit vs blink](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/lessonswebkitblink-linuxconeu-131024075302-phpapp02/95/lessons-from-contributing-to-webkit-and-blink-23-638.jpg)
#WEBKIT VS BLINK SOFTWARE#
Hacktronics wrote:Don't know about assistive technologies, but I used TTS a lot and have written a custom software long back, that is dead now which embeds gecko engine to read websites, ePub books, etc. If we don't defend that choice, then all is lost, including privacy. Choice matters and we are at the point of losing all choice in browsers. Not even the “open” Chromium will have the cloud to stop that, and Google can make changes Chromium will have to take or be increasingly isolated and irrelevant. Like breaking all privacy-related extensions.
![webkit vs blink webkit vs blink](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/webkitblinklinuxcon2013-130917122103-phpapp02/95/webkit-and-blink-open-development-powering-the-html5-revolution-7-638.jpg)
Things like breaking all ad-blocking extensions. They can arbitrarily do what they want….and what we DON'T want. Every other one is a reskin of either Chrome or FF, … mostly Chrome! Once we hand Google the ultimate authority over the web, because they de-facto rule it by controlling the last browser left, we have given away all control. Right now we have FF which is losing market share, and aside from single-vendor closed browsers like Safari, that's it. I don't even agree with many of the choices Moz has made for FF, but think about what happens if we make all browsers into Chrome-based browsers. Firefox can be configured to be more private than Chrom* can be configured to be, but that's not the main concern IMO. they can implement intentionally not universally compatible features that further entrench chromium over other browser engines. they can build more and more restrictive and user-unfriendly functions into the browser. support Mozilla people!) is the day that chromium, dominated by google, dictates web standards.
![webkit vs blink webkit vs blink](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/webkitblinklinuxcon2013-130917122103-phpapp02/95/webkit-and-blink-open-development-powering-the-html5-revolution-2-638.jpg)
the day that blink (chromium) becomes the mono-engine (and we're * close to it. Google of course doesn't use that to make money at all.
![webkit vs blink webkit vs blink](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/webkitblinklinuxcon2013-130917122103-phpapp02/95/webkit-and-blink-open-development-powering-the-html5-revolution-11-638.jpg)
Chrome is just extra bad because on top of that it also feeds user data to Google directly. Blink is much faster, but in real world use that speed doesn't matter (at least for me) and Firefox's privacy is better so I use Firefox.I mean that some people truly believe that, Here are some quotes from Reddit: The fact they are using Google's browser engine they are directly contributing to Google's dominance by passively enforcing “standards” Google is dictating. Chrome is the closed-source browser managed by Google. Rendangbike2 wrote:Some people say we shouldn't use Chromium because it will contribute to the Google monopolyNo, Chrome is different from Chromium.